<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analyzing audience feedback, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://learningalliances.net/2006/11/analyzing-audience-feedback-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://learningalliances.net/2006/11/analyzing-audience-feedback-part-2/</link>
	<description>supporting communities of practice, their leaders and their sponsors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Williams</title>
		<link>http://learningalliances.net/2006/11/analyzing-audience-feedback-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.learningalliances.net/index.php/2006-11-30/analyzing-audience-feedback-part-2#comment-861</guid>
		<description>I find your analysis very interesting John and it rings true with experiences of my own over the years with training sessions and presentations although I have not seen feedback analysed to this degree before.

It seems like a clear example of a good presentation by a good presenter that if I was there I would have said it went well - but at the same time on analysis there were at least some of the 60 present who didn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find your analysis very interesting John and it rings true with experiences of my own over the years with training sessions and presentations although I have not seen feedback analysed to this degree before.</p>
<p>It seems like a clear example of a good presentation by a good presenter that if I was there I would have said it went well &#8211; but at the same time on analysis there were at least some of the 60 present who didn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
